Talk:World War II
It's biased to mention "6 million Jews" but not all the Soviet Union's civilian casualties. Surely the stats of all losses are out there?
. . . I don't know if it's "biased", but we should probably include the Soviet Union's casualties and others. The writer probably just mentioned "6 million Jews" because he or she remembered this number without lookng it up.
On June 28 2004, the article uses the word "mankind". I think we should try not to use this word, because of questions about sexism. I think it would be better to say "humanity" or "human beings".
The despot Stalin should also be mentioned, he was given Europe on a platter!
- And your point is..., kid?
The article is biased... as usual. Considering 80% of all Germany forces (and allies) were concentrated on the Eastern front, you would think there would be a couple paragraphs about the Eastern Front.
- Agree
-G