Talk:Time Cube

I wrote this article because someone is obviously interested enough in it to jam it into our universe.

Not because I believe it is credible at all.

If anything, I am being wildly too fair to it. But Gene Ray did get invited to talk at MIT, so, whatever, he can have one page... it's useful to compare his theory to more credible theories, since a lot of people are reading http://timecube.com and wondering if there's any validity at all.

I continue to disclaim this theory, but have no objection to it being described here. Much worse crap is allowed to pass for scholarship over at EN:, which is the worst of the Wikipedias. Their low standards and personal edit wars and ad hominem censorship should not be allowed here.

Why does it oppose Platonism? I think one could argue that timecube is the perfect idea behind the universe, and gene ray states that it cannot be fully comprehended by any human. Isn't that compatible with platonism?