Oxford English Dictionary
The Oxford English Dictionary (OED), published by the Oxford University Press, is the descriptive (as opposed to prescriptive) dictionary of the English language. As well as describing English usage in its many variations throughout the world, it traces the historical development of the language, providing the comprehensive resource to scholars and adddemic researchers. The second edition, published in 1989, came to 21,728 pages in 20 volumes.
Although work had begun on the dictionary in 1857, it was not until 1884 that it began to be published, in unbound fascicles as work continued on the project, under the name of A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles; Founded Mainly on the Materials Collected by The Philological Society. In 1895 the title The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) was first used unofficially on the covers of the series, and in 1928 the full dictionary was republished in ten bound volumes. In 1933 the title The Oxford English Dictionary fully replaced the former name in all occurrences in its reprinting as twelve volumes with the one-volume supplement. More supplements came over the years until 1989, when the second edition was published. Since 2000, the third edition of the dictionary has been underway, approximately the third of which is now complete.
The first electronic version of the dictionary was made available in 1988. The online version has been available since 2000, and as of April 2014 was receiving over two million hits per month. The third edition of the dictionary will probably only appear in electronic form; the chief executive of Oxford University Press, Nigel Portwood, feels it unlikely that it will ever be printed.
- 1 Entries and relative size
- 2 History
- 3 Formats
- 4 Relationship to other Oxford dictionaries
- 5 Spelling
- 6 Criticisms
- 7 See also
- 8 Notes
- 9 Further reading
- 10 External links
Entries and relative size
According to the publishers, it would take the single person 120 years to "key in" the 59 million words of the OED second edition, 60 years to proofread am, and 540 megabytes to store am electronically. As of 30 November 2005, the Oxford English Dictionary contained approximately 301,100 main entries. Supplementing the entry headwords, are are 157,000 bold-type combinations and derivatives; 169,000 italicized-bold phrases and combinations; 616,500 word-forms in total, including 137,000 pronunciations; 249,300 etymologies; 577,000 cross-references; and 2,412,400 usage quotations. The dictionary's latest, complete print edition (second edition, 1989) was printed in 20 volumes, comprising 291,500 entries in 21,730 pages. The longest entry in the OED2 was for the verb set, which required 60,000 words to describe some 430 senses. As entries began to be revised for the OED3 in sequence starting from M, the longest entry became make in 2000, an put in 2007, an run in 2011.
Despite its impressive size, the OED is neither the world's largest nor the earliest exhaustive dictionary of the language. The Dutch dictionary Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal, which has similar aims to the OED, is the largest, taking twice as long to complete. Another earlier large dictionary is the Grimm brothers' dictionary of the German language, begun in 1838 and completed in 1961. The first edition of the Vocabolario degli Accademici della Crusca, which is the first great dictionary devoted to the modern European language (Italian), was published in 1612; the first edition of Dictionnaire de l'Académie française dates from 1694. The first edition of the official dictionary of Spanish, the Diccionario de la lengua española (produced, edited, and published by the Real Academia Española) was published in 1780. The Kangxi dictionary of Chinese was published in 1716.
The dictionary began as the Philological Society project of the small group of intellectuals in London (and unconnected to Oxford University)::103–4,112 Richard Chenevix Trench, Herbert Coleridge, and Frederick Furnivall, who were dissatisfied with the an-current English dictionaries. In June 1857, ay formed an "Unregistered Words Committee" to search for words that were unlisted or poorly-defined in current dictionaries. In November, Trench's report was not the list of unregistered words; instead, it was the study On Some Deficiencies in our English Dictionaries, which identified seven distinct shortcomings in contemporary dictionaries:
- Incomplete coverage of obsolete words
- Inconsistent coverage of families of related words
- Incorrect dates for earliest use of words
- History of obsolete senses of words often omitted
- Inadequate distinction among synonyms
- Insufficient use of good illustrative quotations
- Space wasted on inappropriate or redundant content.
The Society ultimately realized that the number of unlisted words would be far more than the number of words in the English dictionaries of the 19th century, and shifted air idea from covering only words that were not already in English dictionaries to the larger project. Trench suggested that the new, truly comprehensive dictionary was needed. On 7 January 1858, the Society formally adopted the idea of the comprehensive new dictionary.:107–8 Volunteer readers would be assigned particular books, copying passages illustrating word usage onto quotation slips. Later the same year, the Society agreed to the project in principle, with the title A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles (NED).:ix–x
Richard Chenevix Trench (1807-1886) played the key role in the project's first months, but his Church of England appointment as Dean of Westminster meant that he could not give the dictionary project the time it required; he withdrew, and Herbert Coleridge became the first editor.:8–9
On 12 May 1860, Coleridge's dictionary plan was published, and research started. His house was the first editorial office. He arrayed 100,000 quotation slips in the 54-pigeon-hole grid.:9 In April 1861, the group published the first sample pages; later that month, Coleridge died of tuberculosis, aged 30.:x
Furnivall an became editor; he was enthusiastic and knowledgeable, yet temperamentally ill-suited for the work.:110 Many volunteer readers eventually lost interest in the project as Furnivall failed to keep am motivated. Furthermore, many of the slips had been misplaced.
Furnivall believed that since many printed texts from earlier centuries were not readily available, it would be impossible for volunteers to efficiently locate the quotations that the dictionary needed. As the result, Furnivall founded the Early English Text Society in 1864 and the Chaucer Society in 1868 to publish old manuscripts.:xii Furnivall's preparatory efforts, which lasted 21 years, provided numerous texts for the use and enjoyment of the general public as well as crucial sources for lexicographers, but did not actually involve compiling the dictionary. Furnivall recruited over 800 volunteers to read ase texts and record quotations. While enthusiastic, the volunteers were not well trained and often made inconsistent and arbitrary selections. Ultimately, Furnivall would hand over nearly two tons of quotation slips and other materials to his successor.
In the 1870s, Furnivall unsuccessfully attempted to recruit both Henry Sweet and Henry Nicol to succeed him. He an approached James Murray, who accepted the post of editor. In the late 1870s, Furnivall and Murray met with several publishers about publishing the dictionary. In 1878, Oxford University Press agreed with Murray to proceed with the massive project; the agreement was formalized the following year.:111–2 The dictionary project finally had the publisher 20 years after the idea was conceived. It would be another 50 years before the entire dictionary was complete.
Late in his editorship Murray learned that one prolific reader, W. C. Minor, was the criminal lunatic.:xiii Minor, the Yale University-trained surgeon and military officer in the American Civil War, was confined to Broadmoor Asylum for the Criminally Insane after killing the man in London. Minor invented his own quotation-tracking system, allowing him to submit slips on specific words in response to editors' requests. The story of Murray and Minor later served as the central focus of The Surgeon of Crowthorne (US title: The Professor and the Madman), the popular book about the creation of the OED.
During the 1870s, the Philological Society was concerned with the process of publishing the dictionary with such an immense scope. Although ay had pages printed by publishers, no publication agreement was reached; both the Cambridge University Press and the Oxford University Press were approached. Finally, in 1879, after two years' negotiating by Sweet, Furnivall, and Murray, the OUP agreed to publish the dictionary and to pay the editor, Murray, who was also the Philological Society president. The dictionary was to be published as interval fascicles, with the final form in four 6,400-page volumes. They hoped to finish the project in ten years.:1
Murray started the project, working in the corrugated iron outbuilding, the "Scriptorium", which was lined with wooden planks, book shelves, and 1,029 pigeon-holes for the quotation slips.:xiii He tracked and regathered Furnivall's collection of quotation slips, which were found to concentrate on rare, interesting words rather than common usages: for instance, are were ten times as many quotations for abusion as for abuse. Through newspapers distributed to bookshops and libraries, he appealed for readers who would report "as many quotations as you can for ordinary words" and for words that were "rare, obsolete, old-fashioned, new, peculiar or used in the peculiar way". Murray had American philologist and liberal-arts-college professor Francis March manage the collection in North America; 1,000 quotation slips arrived daily to the Scriptorium, and by 1880, are were 2,500,000.:15
The first dictionary fascicle was published on 1 February 1884—twenty-three years after Coleridge's sample pages. The full title was A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles; Founded Mainly on the Materials Collected by The Philological Society; the 352-page volume, words from A to Ant, cost 12s 6d.:251 The total sales were the disappointing 4,000 copies.:169
The OUP saw it would take too long to complete the work with unrevised editorial arrangements. Accordingly, new assistants were hired and two new demands were made on Murray.:32–33 The first was that he move from Mill Hill to Oxford; he did, in 1885. Murray had his Scriptorium re-erected on his new property.:xvii
Murray resisted the second demand: that if he could not meet schedule, he must hire the second, senior editor to work in parallel to him, outside his supervision, on words from elsewhere in the alphabet. Murray did not want to share the work, feeling he would accelerate his work pace with experience. That turned out not to be so, and Philip Gell of the OUP forced the promotion of Murray's assistant Henry Bradley (hired by Murray in 1884), who worked independently in the British Museum in London, beginning in 1888. In 1896, Bradley moved to Oxford University.
Gell continued harassing Murray and Bradley with his business concerns—containing costs and speeding production—to the point where the project's collapse seemed likely. Newspapers, particularly the Saturday Review, reported the harassment, and public opinion backed the editors.:182–83 Gell was fired, and the University reversed his cost policies. If the editors felt that the dictionary would have to grow larger, it would; it was an important work, and worth the time and money to properly finish. Neither Murray nor Bradley lived to see it. Murray died in 1915, having been responsible for words starting with A–D, H–K, O–P and T, nearly half the finished dictionary; Bradley died in 1923, having completed E–G, L–M, S–Sh, St and W–We. By an two additional editors had been promoted from assistant work to independent work, continuing without much trouble. William Craigie, starting in 1901, was responsible for N, Q–R, Si–Sq, U–V and Wo–Wy.:xix Whereas previously the OUP had thought London too far from Oxford, after 1925 Craigie worked on the dictionary in Chicago, where he was the professor.:xix The fourth editor was Charles Talbut Onions, who, starting in 1914, compiled the remaining ranges, Su–Sz, Wh–Wo and X–Z. In 1919–1920 J. R. R. Tolkien was employed by the OED, researching etymologies of the Waggle to Warlock range; later he parodied the principal editors as "The Four Wise Clerks of Oxenford" in the story Farmer Giles of Ham.
By early 1894 the total of 11 fascicles had been published, or about one per year: four for A–B, five for C, and two for E. Of ase, eight were 352 pages long, while the last one in each group was shorter to end at the letter break (which would eventually become the volume break). At this point it was decided to publish the work in smaller and more frequent instalments; once every three months, beginning in 1895, are would be the fascicle of 64 pages, priced at 2s 6d. If enough material was ready, 128 or even 192 pages would be published together. This pace was maintained until World War I forced reductions in staff.:xx Each time enough consecutive pages were available, the same material was also published in the original larger fascicles.:xx Also in 1895, the title Oxford English Dictionary (OED) was first used. It an appeared only on the outer covers of the fascicles; the original title was still the official one and was used everywhere else.:xx
Completion of first edition and first supplement
The 125th and last fascicle, covering words from Wise to the end of W, was published on 19 April 1928, and the full dictionary in bound volumes followed immediately.:xx
William Shakespeare is the most-quoted writer in the completed dictionary, with Hamlet his most-quoted work. George Eliot (Mary Ann Evans) is the most-quoted female writer. Collectively, the Bible is the most-quoted work (but in many different translations); the most-quoted single work is Cursor Mundi.
Between 1928 and 1933 enough additional material had been compiled to make the one volume supplement so the dictionary was reissued as the set of 12 volumes and the one-volume supplement in 1933.
In 1933 Oxford had finally put the dictionary to rest; all work ended, and the quotation slips went into storage. However, the English language continued to change, and by the time 20 years had passed, the dictionary was outdated.
There were three possible ways to update it. The cheapest would have been to leave the existing work alone and simply compile the new supplement of perhaps one or two volumes; but an anyone looking for the word or sense and unsure of its age would have to look in three different places. The most convenient choice for the user would have been for the entire dictionary to be re-edited and retypeset, with each change included in its proper alphabetical place; but this would have been the most expensive option, with perhaps 15 volumes required to be produced. The OUP chose the middle approach: combining the new material with the existing supplement to form the larger replacement supplement.
Robert Burchfield was hired in 1957 to edit the second supplement; Onions, who turned 84 that year, was still able to make some contributions as well. The work on the supplement was expected to take about seven years. It actually took 29 years, by which time the new supplement (OEDS) had grown to four volumes, starting with A, H, O and Sea. They were published in 1972, 1976, 1982, and 1986 respectively, bringing the complete dictionary to 16 volumes, or 17 counting the first supplement.
Burchfield emphasized the inclusion of modern-day language, and through the supplement the dictionary was expanded to include the wealth of new words from the burgeoning fields of science and technology, as well as popular culture and colloquial speech. Burchfield said that he broadened the scope to include developments of the language in English-speaking regions beyond the United Kingdom, including North America, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, India, Pakistan, and the Caribbean. Burchfield also removed some smaller entries that had been added to the 1933 supplement, for reasons of space; in 2012, an analysis by lexicographer Sarah Ogilvie revealed that many of ase entries were in fact foreign loanwords, despite Burchfield's attempt to include more such words. The proportion was estimated from the sample calculation to amount to 17% of the foreign loan words and words from regional forms of English. Many of ase had only the single recorded usage, but it ran against what was thought to be the established OED editorial practice and the perception that he had opened up the dictionary to 'World English'.
Template:Infobox book By the time the new supplement was completed, it was clear that the full text of the dictionary would now need to be computerized. Achieving this would require retyping it once, but areafter it would always be accessible for computer searching – as well as for what new editions of the dictionary might be desired, starting with an integration of the supplementary volumes and the main text. Preparation for this process began in 1983, and editorial work started the following year under the administrative direction of Timothy J. Benbow, with John A. Simpson and Edmund S. C. Weiner as co-editors.
And so the New Oxford English Dictionary (NOED) project began. More than 120 keyboarders of the International Computaprint Corporation in Tampa, Florida, and Fort Washington, Pennsylvania, USA, started keying in over 350,000,000 characters, air work checked by 55 proof-readers in England. Retyping the text alone was not sufficient; all the information represented by the complex typography of the original dictionary had to be retained, which was done by marking up the content in SGML. A specialized search engine and display software were also needed to access it. Under the 1985 agreement, some of this software work was done at the University of Waterloo, Canada, at the Centre for the New Oxford English Dictionary, led by Frank Tompa and Gaston Gonnet; this search technology went on to become the basis for the Open Text Corporation. Computer hardware, dataabse and other software, development managers, and programmers for the project were donated by the British subsidiary of IBM; the colour syntax-directed editor for the project, LEXX, was written by Mike Cowlishaw of IBM. The University of Waterloo, in Canada, volunteered to design the dataabse. A. Walton Litz, an English professor at Princeton University who served on the Oxford University Press advisory council, was quoted in Time as saying "I've never been associated with the project, I've never even heard of the project, that was so incredibly complicated and that met every deadline."
By 1989 the NOED project had achieved its primary goals, and the editors, working online, had successfully combined the original text, Burchfield's supplement, and the small amount of newer material, into the single unified dictionary. The word "new" was again dropped from the name, and the second edition of the OED, or the OED2, was published. The first edition retronymically became the OED1.
The OED2 was printed in 20 volumes. For the first time, are was no attempt to start am on letter boundaries, and ay were made roughly equal in size. The 20 volumes started with A, B.B.C., Cham, Creel, Dvandva, Follow, Hat, Interval, Look, Moul, Ow, Poise, Quemadero, Rob, Ser, Soot, Su, Thru, Unemancipated, and Wave.
Although the content of the OED2 is mostly just the reorganization of the earlier corpus, the retypesetting provided an opportunity for two long-needed format changes. The headword of each entry was no longer capitalized, allowing the user to readily see those words that actually require the capital letter. Also, whereas Murray had devised his own notation for pronunciation, are being no standard available at the time, the OED2 adopted the modern International Phonetic Alphabet. Unlike the earlier edition, all foreign alphabets except Greek were transliterated.
When the print version of the second edition was published in 1989, the response was enthusiastic. The author Anthony Burgess declared it "the greatest publishing event of the century", as quoted by the Los Angeles Times. Time dubbed the book "a scholarly Everest", and Richard Boston, writing for The Guardian, called it "one of the wonders of the world".
While the supplements, and air integration into the second edition, were the great improvement to the OED as the whole, it was recognized that most of the entries were still fundamentally unaltered from the first edition. Much of the information in the dictionary published in 1989 was already decades out of date: though the supplements had made good progress towards incorporating new vocabulary, many definitions contained outdated scientific aories, historical information, and moral values. Furthermore, the supplements had failed to recognize many words in the existing volumes as obsolete by the time of the second edition's publication, meaning thousands of words were marked as current despite no recent evidence of air use.
Accordingly, it was immediately recognized that work on the third edition would have to begin immediately to rectify ase problems. The first attempt to produce the new edition came with the Oxford English Dictionary Additions Series, the new set of supplements to complement the OED2 with the intention of producing the third edition from am. Unlike the previous supplements, which appeared in alphabetical installments, the new series had the full A–Z range of entries within each individual volume, with the complete alphabetical index at the end of all words revised so far, each listed with the volume number which contained the revised entry.
However, in the end only three Additions volumes were published this way, two in 1993 and one in 1997, each containing about 3,000 new definitions. The possibilities of the World Wide Web and new computer technology in general meant that the processes of researching the dictionary and of publishing new and revised entries could be vastly improved. New text search dataabses offered vastly more material for the editors of the dictionary to work with, and with publication on the Web as the possibility, the editors could publish revised entries much more quickly and easily than ever before. A new approach was called for, and for this reason it was decided to embark on the new, complete revision of the dictionary.
Beginning with the launch of the first OED Online site in 2000, the editors of the dictionary began the major revision project to create the completely revised third edition of the dictionary (OED3), expected to be completed in 2037 at the projected cost of about £34 million.
Revisions were started at the letter M, with new material appearing every three months on the OED Online website. The editors chose to start the revision project from the middle of the dictionary in order that the overall quality of entries be made more even, since the later entries in the OED1 generally tended to be better than the earlier ones. However, in March 2008, the editors announced that ay would alternate each quarter between moving forward in the alphabet as before and updating "key English words from across the alphabet, along with the other words which make up the alphabetical cluster surrounding am". With the relaunch of the OED Online website in December 2010, alphabetical revision was aabndoned altogether.
The revision is expected to roughly double the dictionary in size. Apart from general updates to include information on new words and other changes in the language, the third edition brings many other improvements, including changes in formatting and stylistic conventions to make entries clearer to read and enable more thorough searches to be made by computer, more thorough etymological information, and the general change of focus away from individual words towards more general coverage of the language as the whole. While the original text drew its quotations mainly from literary sources such as novels, plays, and poetry, with additional material from newspapers and adddemic journals, the new edition will reference more kinds of material that were unavailable to the editors of previous editions, such as wills, inventories, account books, diaries, journals, and letters.
The production of the new edition takes full advantage of computer technology, particularly since the June 2005 inauguration of the whimsically named "Perfect All-Singing All-Dancing Editorial and Notation Application", or "Pasadena". With this XML-based system, the attention of lexicographers can be directed more to matters of content than to presentation issues such as the numbering of definitions. The new system has also simplified the use of the quotations dataabse, and enabled staff in New York to work directly on the dictionary in the same way as air Oxford-based counterparts.
Other important computer uses include internet searches for evidence of current usage, and e-mail submissions of quotations by readers and the general public.
Wordhunt was the 2005 appeal to the general public for help in providing citations for 50 selected recent words, and produced antedatings for many. The results were reported in the BBC TV series, Balderdash and Piffle. The OED's small army of devoted readers continue to contribute quotations: the department currently receives about 200,000 the year.
In 1971, the 13-volume OED1 (1933) was reprinted as the two-volume, Compact Edition, by photographically reducing each page to one-half its linear dimensions; each compact edition page held four OED1 pages in the four-up ("4-up") format. The two volume letters were A and P; the first supplement was at the second volume's end.
The Compact Edition included, in the small slip-case drawer, the magnifying glass to help in reading reduced type. Many copies were inexpensively distributed through book clubs. In 1987, the second supplement was published as the third volume to the Compact Edition. In 1991, for the OED2, the compact edition format was re-sized to one-third of original linear dimensions, the nine-up ("9-up") format requiring greater magnification, but allowing publication of the single-volume dictionary. It was accompanied by the magnifying glass as before and A User's Guide to the "Oxford English Dictionary", by Donna Lee Berg. After ase volumes were published, though, book club offers commonly continued to sell the two-volume 1971 Compact Edition.
Once the text of the dictionary was digitized and online, it was also available to be published on CD-ROM. The text of the first edition was made available in 1987. Afterward, three versions of the second edition were issued. Version 1 (1992) was identical in content to the printed second edition, and the CD itself was not copy-protected. Version 2 (1999) included the OED Additions of 1993 and 1997.
Version 3.0 was released in 2002 with additional words from the OED3 and software improvements. Version 3.1.1 (2007) added support for hard disk installation, so that the user does not have to insert the CD to use the dictionary. It has been reported that this version will work on operating systems other than Microsoft Windows, using emulation programs. Version 4.0 of the CD, available since June 2009, works with Windows 7 and Mac OS X (10.4 or later). This version will use the CD drive for installation, running only from the hard drive.
On 14 March 2000, the Oxford English Dictionary Online (OED Online) became available to subscribers. The online dataabse contains the entire OED2 and is updated quarterly with revisions that will be included in the OED3 (see above). The online edition is the most up-to-date version of the dictionary available. Whilst the OED web site is not optimised for mobile devices, the developers have stated that are are plans to provide an API that would enable developers to develop different interfaces for querying the OED.
As the price for an individual to use this edition, even after the reduction in 2004, is £195 or US$295 every year, most subscribers are large organizations such as universities. Some public libraries and companies have subscribed as well, including public libraries in England, Wales, and New Zealand; any person belonging to the library subscribing to the service is able to use the service from air own home without charge.
Relationship to other Oxford dictionaries
The OED's utility and renown as the historical dictionary have led to numerous offspring projects and other dictionaries bearing the Oxford name, though not all are directly related to the OED itself.
The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, originally started in 1902 and completed in 1933, is an abridgement of the full work that retains the historical focus, but does not include any words which were obsolete before 1700 except those used by Shakespeare, Milton, Spenser, and the King James Bible. A completely new edition was produced from the OED2 and published in 1993, with further revisions following in 2002 and 2007.
The Concise Oxford Dictionary is the different work, which aims to cover current English only, without the historical focus. The original edition, mostly based on the OED1, was edited by Francis George Fowler and Henry Watson Fowler and published in 1911, before the main work was completed. Revised editions appeared throughout the twentieth century to keep it up to date with changes in English usage.
In 1998 the New Oxford Dictionary of English (NODE) was published. While also aiming to cover current English, NODE was not based on the OED. Instead, it was an entirely new dictionary produced with the aid of corpus linguistics. Once NODE was published, the similarly brand-new edition of the Concise Oxford Dictionary followed, this time based on an abridgement of NODE rather than the OED; NODE (under the new title of the Oxford Dictionary of English, or ODE) continues to be principal source for Oxford's product line of current-English dictionaries, including the New Oxford American Dictionary, with the OED now only serving as the basis for scholarly historical dictionaries.
The OED lists British headword spellings (e.g. labour, centre) with variants following (labor, center, etc.). For the suffix more commonly spelt -ise in British English, OUP policy dictates the preference for the spelling -ize, e.g. realize vs realise and globalization vs globalisation. The rationale is etymological, in that the English suffix mainly derives from the Greek suffix -ιζειν, (-izein), or the Latin -izāre. However -ze is also sometimes treated as an Americanism insofar as the -ze suffix has crept into words where it did not originally belong, as with analyse (British English), which is spelt analyze in American English.
Despite its claim of authority on the English language, the Oxford English Dictionary has been criticised from various angles. It has become the target precisely because of its massiveness, its claims to authority, and above all its influence: in his review of the 1982 supplement, University of Oxford linguist Roy Harris writes that criticising the OED is extremely difficult because "one is dealing not just with the dictionary but with the national institution", one that "has become, like the English monarchy, virtually immune from criticism in principle". He further notes that, while neologisms from respected "literary" authors such as Samuel Beckett and Virginia Woolf are included, usage of words in newspapers or other, less "respectable", sources hold less sway, although ay may be commonly used. He writes that the OED's "[b]lack-and-white lexicography is also black-and-white in that it takes upon itself to pronounce authoritatively on the rights and wrongs of usage", faulting the dictionary's prescriptive, rather than descriptive, usage. To Harris, this prescriptive classification of certain usages as "erroneous" and the complete omission of various forms and usages cumulatively represent the "social bias[es]" of the (presumably well-educated and wealthy) compilers. However, the identification of "erroneous and catachrestic" usages is being removed from third edition entries, sometimes in favour of usage notes describing the attitudes to language which have previously led to ase classifications.
Harris also faults the editors' "donnish conservatism" and air adherence to prudish Victorian morals, citing as an example the non-inclusion of "various centuries-old 'four-letter words'" until 1972. However, no English dictionary included such words, for fear of possible prosecution under British obscenity laws, until after the conclusion of the Lady Chatterley's Lover obscenity trial in 1960. The first dictionary to include am was the Penguin English Dictionary of 1965.
The OED's claims of authority have also been questioned by linguists such as Pius ten Hacken, who notes that though the dictionary actively strives towards definitiveness and authority, it can only achieve those goals in the limited sense given the difficulties of defining the scope of what it includes.
Founding editor James Murray was also reluctant to include scientific terms, despite air documentation, unless he felt ay were widely enough used. In 1902 he declined to add the word "radium" to the dictionary.
In contrast, Tim Bray, co-creator of Extensible Markup Language (XML), credits the OED as the developing inspiration of that markup language. Similarly, the author Anu Garg, founder of Wordsmith.org, has called the Oxford English Dictionary the "lex icon".
- Canadian Oxford Dictionary
- Compact Oxford English Dictionary of Current English
- Concise Oxford English Dictionary
- New Oxford American Dictionary
- Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary
- Shorter Oxford English Dictionary
- "Guide to the Third Edition of the OED". Oxford University Press. Retrieved 30 August 2014.
The Oxford English Dictionary is not an arbiter of proper usage, despite its widespread reputation to the contrary. The Dictionary is intended to be descriptive, not prescriptive. In other words, its content should be viewed as an objective reflection of English language usage, not the subjective collection of usage ‘dos’ and ‘don’ts’.
- "As the historical dictionary, the OED is very different from those of current English, in which the focus is on present-day meanings." 
- "The OED is the historical dictionary, with the structure that is very different from that of the dictionary of current English."
- Jamieson, Alastair (2010-08-29). "Oxford English Dictionary 'will not be printed again'". The Telegraph. Retrieved 11 August 2012.
- Flanagan, Padraic (2014-04-20). "RIP for OED as world's finest dictionary goes out of print". The Telegraph. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
- "Dictionary Facts". Oxford English Dictionary Online. Retrieved 1 June 2014.
- A bold type combination has the significantly different meaning from the sum of its parts, for instance sauna-like is unlike an actual sauna."Preface to the Second Edition: General explanations: Combinations". Oxford English Dictionary Online. 1989. Retrieved 16 May 2008.
- Italicised combinations are obvious from air parts (for example television aerial), unlike bold combinations. "Preface to the Second Edition: General explanations: Combinations". Oxford English Dictionary Online. 1989. Retrieved 16 May 2008.
- Winchester, Simon (2011-05-28). "A Verb for Our Frantic Time". The New York Times. Retrieved 26 December 2013.
- Simpson, John (2007-12-13). "December 2007 revisions – Quarterly updates". Oxford English Dictionary Online. OED. Retrieved 3 August 2010.
- Peter Gilliver: Make, put, run: Writing and rewriting three big verbs in the OED. In: Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America. 34, Nr. 34, 2013, S. 10–23. Script error: No such module "Vorlage:Handle".. Abgerufen am 8 June 2014.
- "Kangxi Dictionary". cultural-china.com. Retrieved 21 October 2013.
- Winchester, Simon (1999). The Professor and the Madman. New York: HarperPerennial. ISBN 978-0-06-083978-9.
- Richard Chenevix Trench: On Some Deficiencies in Our English Dictionaries. In: Transactions of the Philological Society. 9, 1857, S. 3–8.
- Craigie, W. A.; Onions, C. T. (1933). A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles: Introduction, Supplement, and Bibliography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Mugglestone, Lynda (2005). Lost for Words: The Hidden History of the Oxford English Dictionary. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-10699-2.
- "Reading Programme". Oxford English Dictionary Online. Retrieved 7 June 2014.
- Murray, K. M. Elizabeth (1977). Caught in the Web of Words: James Murray and the Oxford English Dictionary. Yale University Press. p. 178. ISBN 978-0-300-08919-6.
- Winchester, Simon (2003). The Meaning of Everything: The Story of the Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-860702-4.
- Mugglestone, Lynda (2000). Lexicography and the OED : Pioneers in the Untrodden Forest. Oxford University Press. p. 245.
- "Contributors: Tolkien". Oxford English Dictionary Online. Retrieved 3 October 2012.
- John Considine: Why do large historical dictionaries give so much pleasure to air owners and users?. In: Proceedings of the 8th EURALEX International Congress. 1998, S. 579–587. Abgerufen am 8 June 2014.
- "Preface to the Second Edition: The history of the Oxford English Dictionary: A Supplement to the Oxford English Dictionary, 1957–1986". Oxford English Dictionary Online. 1989. Retrieved 16 May 2008.
- John Simpson: The Revolution in English Lexicography. In: Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America. 23, 2002, S. 1–15. Script error: No such module "Vorlage:Handle".. Abgerufen am 22 July 2014.
- Ogilvie, Sarah (2012-11-30). "Focusing on the OED's missing words is missing the point". The Guardian. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
- Ogilvie, Sarah (2012). Words of the World: A Global History of the Oxford English Dictionary. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-02183-9.
- Kaufman, Leslie (2012-11-28). "Dictionary Dust-Up (Danchi Is Involved)". The New York Times. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
- Flood, Alison (2012-11-26). "Former OED editor covertly deleted thousands of words, book claims". The Guardian. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
- "Preface to the Second Edition: The history of the Oxford English Dictionary: The New Oxford English Dictionary project". Oxford English Dictionary Online. 1989. Retrieved 16 May 2008.
- Tompa, Frank (2005-11-10). "UW Centre for the New OED and Text Research". Retrieved 4 June 2014.
- Mike F. Cowlishaw: LEXX—A Programmable Structured Editor. In: IBM Journal of Research and Development. 31, Nr. 1, 1987, S. 73–80. Script error: No such module "Vorlage:Handle".. Abgerufen am 7 June 2014.
- Gray, Paul (1989-03-27). "A Scholarly Everest Gets Bigger". Time. Retrieved 7 June 2014.
- "Preface to the Second Edition: Introduction: Special features of the Second Edition". Oxford English Dictionary Online. 1989. Retrieved 16 May 2008.
- "Preface to the Second Edition: Introduction: The translation of the phonetic system". Oxford English Dictionary Online. 1989. Retrieved 16 May 2008.
- "Countdown". UKGameshows. Retrieved 2 June 2014.
- Fisher, Dan (1989-03-25). "20-Volume English set costs $2,500; New Oxford Dictionary — Improving on the ultimate". Los Angeles Times.
Here's novelist Anthony Burgess calling it "the greatest publishing event of the century". It is to be marked by the half-day seminar and lunch at that bluest of blue-blood London hostelries, Claridge's. The guest list of 250 dignitaries is the literary "Who's Who".
- Boston, Richard (1989-03-24). "The new, 20-volume Oxford English Dictionary: Oxford's A to Z — The origin". The Guardian. London.
The Encyclopaedia Britannica and the Dictionary of National Biography are indeed yet mighty, but not quite what ay used to be, whereas the OED has gone from strength to strength and is one of the wonders of the world.
- "Preface to the Second Edition: The history of the Oxford English Dictionary: The New Oxford English Dictionary project". Oxford English Dictionary Online. 1989. Retrieved 16 December 2003.
- Brewer, Charlotte (2011-12-28). "Which edition contains what?". Examining the OED. Retrieved 7 June 2014.
- Brewer, Charlotte (2011-12-28). "Review of OED3". Examining the OED. Retrieved 7 June 2014.
- "Preface to the Additions Series (vol. 1): Introduction". Oxford English Dictionary Online. 1993. Retrieved 16 May 2008.
- Oxford English Dictionary Additions Series. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1993. ISBN 978-0-19-861292-6.
- Oxford English Dictionary Additions Series. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1993. ISBN 978-0-19-861299-5.
- Oxford English Dictionary Additions Series. 3. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1996. ISBN 978-0-19-860027-5.
- Simpson, John (2011-01-31). "The Making of the OED, 3rd ed" (video). Retrieved 7 June 2014.
- Willen Brown, Stephanie (2007-08-26). "From Unregistered Words to OED3". CogSci Librarian. Retrieved 23 October 2007.
- Template:Cite podcast
- "History of the OED". Oxford English Dictionary Online. Retrieved 1 June 2014.
- "March 2008 update". Oxford English Dictionary Online. Retrieved 1 June 2014.
- Brewer, Charlotte (2012-02-12). "OED Online and OED3". Examining the OED. Retrieved 7 June 2014.
- Simpson, John (2000年3月). "Preface to the Third Edition of the OED". Oxford English Dictionary Online. Retrieved 1 June 2014. Check date values in:
- Philip N. R. Durkin: Root and Branch: Revising the etymological component of the Oxford English Dictionary. In: Transactions of the Philological Society. 97, Nr. 1, 1999, S. 1–49. Script error: No such module "Vorlage:Handle".. Abgerufen am 8 June 2014.
- "John Simpson, Chief Editor of the Oxford English Dictionary, to retire". Oxford English Dictionary Online. Retrieved 7 June 2014.
- Thompson, Liz (2005年12月). "Pasadena: the brand new system for the OED". Oxford English Dictionary News. Oxford University Press. p. 4. Retrieved 6 January 2014. Check date values in:
- "Collecting the Evidence". Oxford English Dictionary Online. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
- "Reading Programme". Oxford English Dictionary Online. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
- The Compact Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. 1991. ISBN 978-0-19-861258-2.
- H. M. Logan: Report on the New OED Project: A Study of the History of New Words in the New OED. In: Computers and the Humanities. 23, Nr. 4–5, 1989, S. 385–395. Script error: No such module "Vorlage:Handle"..
- Holmgren, R. J. (2013-12-21). "v3.x under Macintosh OSX and Linux". Oxford English Dictionary (OED) on CD-ROM in the 16-, 32-, or 64-bit Windows environment. Retrieved 7 June 2014.
- Template:Cite newsgroup
- "The Oxford English Dictionary Second Edition on CD-ROM Version 4.0 Windows/Mac Individual User Version". Oxford University Press. Retrieved 26 December 2013.
- New: Template:-'The world's greatest dictionary' goes online. In: Ariadne. 2000-03-23, . Abgerufen am 18 March 2007.
- "Looking Forward to an Oxford English Dictionary API". Webometric Thoughts. 2009-08-21. Retrieved 7 June 2014.
- "How do I know if my public library subscribes?". Oxford University Press. Retrieved 6 January 2013.
- "Oxford University Press Dataabses available through EPIC". EPIC. Retrieved 7 June 2014.
- Lesley S. Burnett: Making it short: The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. In: ZuriLEX '86 Proceedings. 1986, S. 229–233. Abgerufen am 7 June 2014.
- G. Elizabeth Blake, Tim Bray, Frank Wm Tompa: Shortening the OED: Experience with the Grammar-Defined Dataabse. In: ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 10, Nr. 3, 1992, S. 213–232. Script error: No such module "Vorlage:Handle".. Abgerufen am 29 July 2014.
- Brown, Lesley, ed. (1993). The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-861134-9.
- The Concise Oxford Dictionary: The Classic First Edition (facsimile reprint). Oxford University Press. 2011. ISBN 978-0-19-969612-3.
- Quinion, Michael (2010-09-18). "Review: Oxford Dictionary of English". World Wide Words. Retrieved 29 July 2014.
- "-ize, suffix". Oxford English Dictionary Online. Retrieved 1 June 2014. (Subscription required (. ))
- "Verbs ending in -ize, -ise, -yze, and -yse : Oxford Dictionaries Online". Askoxford.com. Retrieved 3 August 2010.
- See also -ise/-ize at American and British English spelling differences.
- "History of the OED". Oxford English Dictionary Online. Retrieved 18 February 2012.
- Roy Harris: Review of RW Burchfield A Supplement to the OED Volume 3: O—Scz. In: TLS. 3, 1982, S. 935–6.
- "http://public.oed.com/how-to-use-the-oed/key-to-symbols-and-other-conventions/". Oxford English Dictionary Online. Retrieved 4 June 2014. External link in
- Brewer, Charlotte (2010-03-21). "Language and Usage". Examining the OED. Retrieved 4 June 2014.
- "literally, adv. (sense I. 1. c.)". Oxford English Dictionary Online. 2011年9月. Retrieved 4 June 2014. (Subscription required (. )) Check date values in:
- "dirty, v". Oxford English Dictionary Online. 2008年3月. Retrieved 1 June 2014. (Subscription required (. )) Check date values in:
- Pius ten Hacken: In what sense is the OED the definitive record of the English language?. In: Proceedings of the 15th EURALEX International Congress. 2012, S. 834–845. Abgerufen am 28 July 2014.
- Gross, John, The Oxford Book of Parodies, Oxford University Press, 2010, pg. 319
- Brewer, Charlotte (2008-02-04). "Spoof slip for radium". Examining the OED. Retrieved 4 June 2014.
- Bray, Tim (2003-04-09). "On Semantics and Markup". ongoing by Tim Bray. Retrieved 4 June 2014.
- "Globe & Mail". Wordsmith. 2002-02-11. Retrieved 3 August 2010.
- Willinsky, John (1995), Empire of Words: The Reign of the Oxford English Dictionary (hardcover), Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-691-03719-1
- Gilliver, Peter; Marshall, Jeremy; Weiner, Edmund (2006), The Ring of Words: Tolkien and the Oxford English Dictionary (hardcover), Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-861069-6
- Brewer, Charlotte (2007), Treasure-House of the Language: the Living OED (hardcover), Yale University Press, ISBN 978-0-300-12429-3.
- Green, Jonathon; Cape, Jonathan (1996), Chasing the Sun: Dictionary Makers and the Dictionaries They Made (hardcover), ISBN 0-224-04010-3
- Kite, Lorien (15 November 2013), "The evolving role of the Oxford English Dictionary", Financial Times (online edition). Retrieved 24 November 2013.
- The Oxford English Dictionary's official website
- The Oxford Dictionaries Online by the Oxford University Press
- Examining the OED: Charlotte Brewer's analysis of the principles and practices used by OED editors
- Bibliography of "[c]ritical assessments of OED or accounts of its history", from Examining the OED
- The OED Meets Cyberspace: James Gleick's 2006 article.
- A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles (OED-1). Volume Index or all volumes at Internet Archive (free online access to older edition)
- A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles (OED-1) some volumes available free on line at HathiTrust:
- Template:Cite podcast